Delo-x.net

In our case there is not only bitterness of losses, but also pleasant moments, the finds; but let's start everything in order.

In this statement is a phrase, that the defendants do not come to the Arbitration court of Petersburg and Leningrad region. We need to excuse, to forgive, to sympathize them for this, them are clearly not up to us now and later; need to spend all of our (taxpayers) money, to deliver to the offices all kickbacks, to negotiate with the prosecutors, the cops, the FSB and above «simply so». When do they find the time to go to the courts? The money stolen in order to use them, and not give on demand or court decision.

Key: Arbitration court

We go back to the phrase and take it like the key: «Arbitration court». The phrase is simple, no significance, but this is false, it is a whole layer, the whole machine and a bunch of all information, which can lift the veil and to highlight a number of pleasant moments, and we will shake this tree, maybe something interesting and joyful will fall down. Initially we are looking, how does arbitration in Russia, to understand how and where it flows and moves.

We will not explore the staffing, it is troublesome and thankless job, and the information is not enough, because it's not a VIP-person, except on the forums who will come out.

The judges of Arbitration courts are judged by a team of two or three offices and by calls from the top («telephone justice»). Everyone in these positions is protege of Putin personally in St. Petersburg and Moscow; so to try and to get something from Kirilenko is very problematic, more precisely it is practically impossible.

We are opening the official (State) the site of the Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg and Leningrad region www.SPBARBITR.RU, we are seeing the site structure, we are meeting with the leadership, with affairs practice, to the examples to understand wich decisions are made, when the same type of situations and arbitration cases.

Be sure to look, who prepared and maintained the site, to understand the qualifications of the administrators and editors of the site. In our case we were lucky, because Petersburg's company «Code (Kodeks)» (famous throughout Russia for its legal programs) is working with the site, this company has withstood the attack of hackers on the Court's website.

We visited the website a long time ago; we have not tested, that is left after the attack, but we will publish interesting from the sheet with working marks by the case. Obligatory and even primary legal education is not required, just to be able to read and occasionally watch the legal terminology, economic and other (we are increasing the level of knowledge and we are spending time well)…

Devil (the jurisprudence) is not so black as he is painted. Sopromat (Strength of Materials) etc. - it's really scary. Any discipline (science) it's a set of terms, stamps, circuits, structures, mechanisms and levers, as well as laws and methods by which they revolve. There is nothing wrong, but the excitement of the first timid steps. We have already passed many labyrinths, so, let's try to go through and this; we have the experience.
We go back to the main page and once again look at all the inscriptions and pop-up windows, try to open them, something it turns out, something no; we are going back to the terminology again, who and how calls yourself on judicial language: the «Plaintiff», the «Defendant»…

If You or the victim just filed a claim in Arbitration court, then you are the «Plaintiff»; you can write your last name, first name and patronymic (name of organization) and your arbitration case with the procedures, decisions will be displayed on the PC screen.

Looked, was delighted that the arbitration case is not lost and the case remembered by senior officials of Arbitration, but You are not easier from this, there are no money and team of Kirilenko together with the city administration!

Let's go ahead and type in the box below, with an inscription the «Defendant» firm «Detstvo (Childhood)» and… Oh! Mama MIA, Santa Maria, Holy Diva… All eyes glued to the screen…

Christianity unanimously turned its head to the side of the Pope! What…
Islam waited, Now something will happen…
Buddhists of whole world came out of Nirvana and hit the drums loudly…
A thousand religions and two million gods in India numb from the miracle, even they don't have such exotic …
All humanoids of the Universe for a minute decided: «Unsubscribe from contact with earthlings in the next thousand (1000) years»…
Bitterly, bitterly wept Berezovsky… etc. etc…

Turn off your PC, put in sleep mode, let`s go smoking, to drink tea, to take the pills for stress and…

The time has passed, switch on, press and… Oh, miracle! Appeared a «Universal Messiah»!
We do not know how you, but we have got more than ninety (90) of arbitration cases

…

We are beginning to sift them…
A number of cases have the same type name, ie the root word.
Several old arbitration cases of the company «Childhood» lawsuits withdrawn or satisfied.
The bulk of the cases and events began in 2006, before this date, Kirilenko M. Senior and Junior were friends with the head (they don't went out of their mind). If until 31.12.2006, the plaintiffs (creditors) something got, since 01.01.2007, they gave three fingers - «Bupkis» all victims, without exception!!!...
(Translator's note: «Bupkis» (zilch, fig sign) - it is a combination of three fingers, the gesture to Russia means a donut hole, the bursting of the bubble, nothing).

To rewrite the whole Internet makes no sense, let's go quickly in all arbitration cases as of 21.01.2009 year (Case № А-56-3019/2009) with some numbers, phone numbers, comments and other; we start with the «dead duck»… the result of all is one, null!...

(Translator's note: the number and series of arbitration cases are not translated for ease of copying on the website of the Arbitration court).

1. А56-42824/2006… OAO «PARNAS M», the management of Kumarin, sausage, phone 718-64-41, 324-98-87 Fax; He scammed the host of the «Night St. Petersburg» within the framework of laws, Bravo!
2. А56-43663/2006… OOO «INFOLINK», pasta «Shebekino», phone 336-92-04
3. А56-43901/2006… OOO «FORTUNA», vegetables, phone 301-34-05
4. А56-43874/2006… OOO «Neva Fish», a fish
5. А56-44930/2006… OOO «Trading house Grumant», these are sidekicks of M. Kirilenko, they returned them everything
6. А56-45508/2006… OOO «DEKALAT», milk, the debt is 558.517 rubles, phone 326-33-66
7. А56-45607/2006… OOO «FAJeTON-AGRO», the branch of the hosts on the Transportnaja street, gave everything
8. А56-46214/2006… ZAO «Torgovlya ot PETMOLA» (Trade from Petmol), a fig sign to 383.912 rubles.
9. А56-48571/2006… OAO «Luzhskiy Milk factory», a fig sign to 134.000 rubles.
10. А56-50796/2006… OOO «ATLANTIDA»
11. А56-52365/2006… OAO «SEVZAPMOLOKO», a fig sign to 498.500 rubles.
12. А56-630/ 2007…... OOO «Russkij proekt»
13. А56-1985/2007…. ZAO «BIOKOM»
14. А56-2168/2007…. OOO «BELAGUL»
15. А56-2766/2007…. ZAO «GEROION»
16. А56-2774/2007…. ZAO «DIROS VUD»
17. А56-3080/2007…. OOO «TRADING HOUSE ATEJa»
18. А56-4331/2007…. SHPK «RUSSKIJ FERMER»
19. А56-4531/2007…. OOO MK «DIETPRODUKT»
20. А56-4880/2007…. SPK «Poultry Farm UDARNIK»
21. А56-5268/2007…. OAO «Fish Processing plant № 1»
22. А56-54062007….. OOO «DELTA»
23. А56-5930/2007…. ZAO «Tribal Plant named after Telman»
24. А56-6241/2007…. OOO «United Trading Company»
25. А56-6399/2007…. OOO «PRADO», he scammed this firm a few times with different firms
26. А56-6565/2007…. OOO «KAMPOFUDS», went through two commas
27. А56-6728/2007…. OOO «EVROTREJDING»
28. А56-7191/2007…. OOO «FUDMARKET»
29. А56-7596/2007…. OOO «Balttorgservis»
30. А56-7991/2007…. OOO «Molokoprodukt»
31. А56-8396/2007…. ZAO «Meat-Packing Plant St. Petersburg»
32. А56-8374/2007…. OOO «Lenoblmoloko», there is evidence that, perhaps, gave,...
33. А56-8574/2007…. OOO «Trading house BIS»
34. А56-8730/2007…. OOO «MIRATORG-SPb», open to question
35. А56-8600/2007…. OOO «JuNIMILK», the children drink milk well, Holy shit...
36. А56-11356/2007… OOO «PITERFRUT», open to question
37. А56-11753/2007… OOO «Petrovskij Confectionery House», probably knocked «torpedoes»...
38. А56-12796/2007… OAO «Contract firm PETROSNAB»
39. А56-12789/2007… OOO «RESTEK», exhibitions, advertising
40. А56-13541/2007… ZAO «Agrofirm Vyborzhec», distressful
41. А56-14319/2007… OOO «Trading house Stimul»
42. А56-14560/2007… OOO «Trading house Adilya», distressful
43. А56-14983/2007… OAO «Experimental Plant Lebedjansky»…

A little rest and there is a reason to laugh… You see advertisements and juices of «Lebedjansky» every day, at the stores and at own table. When changing the property rights of the enterprise to a new owner the company and its shareholders, the rights to sue their customers and debtors! In 2008 «Lebedjansky» was bought by a company with a worldwide reputation PEPSICO, ie to the shareholders went of their rights to make claims for material and moral damage, even the Lord!...

How many will remain in the country budget money, if the shareholders will sue to the Russian Government and the Presidents of the country and will sue for moral damages and the reputation of the firm?! Let they are-people of the democratic America receive from them a tuft of wool!!!

1. А56-16314/2007… ZAO «Gerion-1»
2. А56-16842/2007… Pension Fund Management in the Primorsky district
3. А56-17918/2007… OOO «KANTRIFUD»
4. А56-22878/2007… OOO «REKON»
5. А56-25989/2007… OOO «Akvaintertorg»
6. А56-38230/2007… OVO at the Internal Affairs for the Central District of St. Petersburg… Eureka!!!

Our show-off, if they don't kink and not crap one's pants so that they will not be themselves, it's kind of their calling card… The physiology of the body from the cops so, that they sit like Idols with palms up, and they see straight ahead; and they have protected Kirilenko behind themselves, with the company «Childhood» («Detstvo»); they are looking for those, who they do not know, but not those who they protect!!!

There is an opinion, he (Kirilenko) has paid with the leadership of the police in cash without receipts; why the money to the cashier to hand over, if own pocket is closer! Have you ever seen in your life that show-off (cops) on the road released the offender without dough?! There is violation, but here they (police patrols) for days worked hard, guarded!...

А56-53887/2007… OAO «Northwestern TELEKOM», firm used telephone numbers and Communications of the «PETESTAR»; all the files are there, here is the Internet services…

Well, finally the servants of the people got out, who unanimously said, that they do not know Kirilenko, they have not seen or heard. Rumor in St. Petersburg and the noise of the suppliers was heard in the offices, but «Perhaps» them're lucky again and everyone sat quietly; we had to give the serious information, that the documents passed all circles and not today or tomorrow will go to the Lubyanka (FSB Moscow)… and the rats began to stir; it was necessary to protect one very favorite body part… and began...

1. А56-7119/2008… Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg, for the non-delivery of 2006
2. А56-15715/2008 «NEVSKAYA BAKALEYA», they woke up
3. А56-16048/2008… Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg again
4. А56-17577/2008... GDOU (Public preschool educational institution) № 16 (kindergarten) of Moskovsky district, for the non-delivery of 2006,...
5. А56-17964/2008… GDOU № 269 …for the non-delivery of 2006, and on a court yard already 2008...
6. А56-17961/2008… GDOU № 77
7. А56-18247/2008… GDOU № 57
8. А56-18244/2008… GDOU № 37
9. А56-18132/2008… GDOU № 12
10. А56-18126/2008… GDOU № 113
11. А56-18381/2008… GDOU № 51
12. А56-18377/2008… GDOU № 91
13. А56-18359/2008… GDOU № 23
14. А56-18292/2008… GDOU № 31
15. А56-18588/2008… GDOU № 24
16. А56-18417/2008… GDOU № 310
17. А56-18655/2008… GDOU № 28
18. А56-18652/2008… GDOU № 35 with correction, i.e. sick children. The debt is returning from USA!
19. А56-19017/2008… GDOU № 99
20. А56-18838/2008… GDOU № 22
21. А56-19186/2008… GDOU № 2
22. А56-19886/2008… GDOU № 11
23. А56-19878/2008… GDOU № 8
24. А56-22977/2008… GDOU № 3
25. А56-23336/2008… GDOU № 33
26. А56-23333/2008… GDOU № 107
27. А56-24749/2008… GDOU № 28
28. А56- 31689/2008... GDOU № 113 with correction, pay from the United States for Kumarin (salvation the children, our kowtow to the bandits of St. Petersburg once again), «Tambovskie», you give money to children without us... and you will post online...
29. А56-39999/2008… GDOU № 24
30. А56-49249/2008… GDOU № 8
31. А56-3019/2009… GDOU № 77 (of 21.01.2009), we did not look further, in the course of events…

How can we not rejoice? Whole St. Petersburg with the Russian President robbed!...

Note: as you know, many are not listed, because they do not believe in justice in Russia...

All shareholders of JSC (ZAO), LLC (OOO) etc. have a right both legal and natural persons to sue non-pecuniary damage, even to God; in the JSC all are the shareholders, in the kindergartens, etc. are the administration and the parents of the children and their guardians!!!

Now let's look at the other cases of the fugitives with children's budget money:
They steal in the administrations long ago, constantly; explore all the pockets is the long matter, that 5-6 lifes of the generations of Russian citizens do not have enough, given the fact that everywhere is the «SECRET»: State, official, commercial, investigation,… the greatest security classification it's – the secret of bribery, kickback and... although the tariffs can be read in the newspaper «AiF (Arguments and Facts)»…

we have not studied how privatization of enterprises Social feeding SPb took place, but Kirilenko M.M. has an interest to one enterprise – it's SPb GUP KSP «JuNOST (YOUTH)».

Part of workers, who escaped with the owner are now out there; is it true, that no one knows how, and who called each other by names? Learn how to work, A. Chapman!! (Translator's Note: Anna Chapman this is declassified agent of the Russian intelligence)!

We are writing on the website: Defendant «KSP GUP JuNOST», in other embodiments, and something comes out, after reviewing the case we found the strange information:

1. дела А56-16558/2002… SPb GUP «VESNA»?;
2. А56-24150/2002года… SPb GUP «VESNA»?;
3. А56-18424/2003… OAO «FORTUNA»?;
4. А56-34583/2003… OOO «Frunzensky Fruit and Vegetable Combine»?;
5. А56-40438/2003… GUZhA of Moskovsky district,
6. А56-42808/2003… OOO «Lenoblmoloko»,
7. А56-45400/2003… OAO «Leningrad bread products plant named after S. M. KIROV»?!...

Arbitration cases are lay without movement!!!.. No money, disappeared and did not need anyone from suppliers, and the courts are full of its own affairs…

Defendant «OOO Trading house RADUGA (RAINBOW)»... The Federal tax service of Russia together with the St. Petersburg custom looking for someone, (А56-23174/2006), but can not find and declare them bankrupt, those forgiven for a certain percentage of our and your money (public sector wages, child benefits, etc.) 16.11.2006, probably, did they walk through the border wearing the cap of darkness, with the documents of tax service, which were forged by the CIA? MI6…

If the INN (Taxpayer Identification Number) or name of the founders will coincide, you get, that St. Petersburg Administration deliberately missed bankrupt firm to participate in the tender, well and consequences...

А56-6075/2008 of 19.02.2008 and А56-8151/2008 of 14.03.2008 – it's ZAO «ARTIS-BABY FOOD», it is a branch of the Czech company «Arla Foods».

In the cases you saw them, but one oddity was with them, In addition, that wanted whack out him (Kirilenko M. M.), ie before dispatch of the materials to the FSB 27.05.2008, in this case opened the sheet with an amount, the documents on pages 53-54; but after the company «Code» have rendered service and the documents were removed, but we have, …

Defendant «Peterburg-Dietprodukt»… a lot of things written, but the most interesting, that the State Tax Service sues again, it does not find them, and declares by the bankruptcy. Other lenders plaintiffs of the arbitration go to the bailiffs with the decisions, and they rubbing their nose in the paper, that at the request of tax inspection, they declared bankrupt and to take nothing from them; go away! with all your papers. «Peterburg-Dietprodukt» and similar companies are working with the Russian budget with a high profit. Did they suddenly go bankrupt?! Dear lawyers and entrepreneurs, You need to read what to do in case of bankruptcy; but that the tax inspection with «Peterburg-Dietprodukt» and the other make is called the collusion about premeditated bankruptcy and qualifies as a crime committed by a group of persons; and for organizations working with budget money, including with money of the children, as a serious crime… «Boss! All is lost» (Translator's note: a phrase from the famous Soviet movie «The Diamond Arm»)...

Key: Peterburg-Dietprodukt Fisenko

We started in 2011 to view in details the companies that fled; we initially learned about V. I. Fesenko (he was Financial Director there before escaping «Childhood») only by home addresses and stunning discovery again. He was CEO of the company «Petersburg-Dietprodukt», which fled before this; it fed the social services and prisons, including key: Peterburg-Dietprodukt Fisenko; It is a branch of «Special Service (Specobsluzhivanie)», they all sat at the address of the Voznesensky, 25 (there Extracurricular education of St. Petersburg), but the most interesting they sign the contract with V. I. Matvienko on charity for veterans of the great Patriotic war!!!

Key: Peterburg-Dietprodukt Matvienko Special Service

Key: Peterburg-Dietprodukt Matvienko Special Service etc. and after the tax inspection can not find a budget provider and partner of the city…

Different companies are protecting children, but many «TITAN» (security companies), go with the inscription 007, James Bond, but they are protecting Administrations and «Special Service» too; to find the villains, are they Dare?!

Suppliers talk, on Bakunin Avenue, 6; it was a company «Perspective», escaped also...

We have reached to the «defendant», no one can find; firefighters are looking for, the police is looking for; how to find?...

Key: Smolninskoe Karapetjan

Dear viewers, stop listening of the Show off; Key in the hands of everyone and the Internet, we are writing as in America key: Smolninskoe Karapetjan (Director, he is in documents) and you see, wherever from he came, what are the offices he manages, where his wife and relatives were comfortably fixed…

OOO GUP «Smolninskoe» picture as 1:1, Arbitration Court recognizes «Smolninsky» bankrupt as a missing company… outwardly all as usual, but one should not read the court's decision, and all letters one by one and to understand, what it mean.

GUP – this is State Unitary Enterprise, founder it's the Public Authority (municipality…), the Founder is responsible all of his possessions to the creditors (by the debts)!

Money bye-bye..; can the tax authorities find the GUP?! All of the tax authorities, as a rule, territorially attached to the administrative division (we have only Abramovich far…), it turns out: Tax inspection can not find the state Administration in the territory, which is! The state has lost itself!

Similarly, no one saw the money and never will get, if the whole world (the country) did not collect again!
When we viewed the arbitration cases, such impression, these are not all fugitives and victims, there are some more.
We do not know where the supervisory authorities are looking and what they are checking – here for them, «El Dorado and the Klondike» all-in-one, just keep your pockets wider!!!...

The same persons noticed in some firms, some are moving from firm to firm as by the stairs; some are working autonomously, they only heard about each other;
But if we analyze their behavior and actions, that they are working the same scenario (the scheme),
which was invented, tested, put into service in the Smolny and other offices!
These are modernization, innovation and nanotechnology in St. Petersburg! We are first!

P.S.:

1. We went at the www.SPBARBITR.RU, before the download of the site and we were not mistaken, after 21.01.2009, the Administration is still 10 months; they wore the papers through the courts in search Kirilenko, of the justice and protection from our Guarantors of Constitution, but to no avail.
2. Site updated slightly; we did not check that the lost, it is sufficient that we have seen with our own eyes, but there was a link, go to www.KAD.ARBITR.RU the archive of the Arbitration court and the decisions (judgment) of the arbitration cases opened well there... good luck!

We decided to copy the list of other schools and kindergartens,

because the Criminal cases are lost in our free state of Vladimir Putin, and files are in 5 seconds ... of Enter!

Pages to read from the bottom up, there are others with a similar name…

1. Arbitration case №: А56-7616/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №32 of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia for Leningrad region
   
2. Case №: А56-7685/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №6 f Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
3. Case №: А56-7693/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 14 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
4. Case №: А56-7694/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 11 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
5. Case №: А56-7695/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 30 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
6. Case №: А56-3019/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №77 Moscovsky district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
7. Case №: А56-10247/2009
   Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 13 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
8. Case №: А56-9889/2009
   Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 567 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
9. Case №: А56-9891/2009
   Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 412 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
   Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
   Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
10. Case №: А56-8503/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 319 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
11. Case №: А56-8518/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 429 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
12. Case №: А56-8520/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 436 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
13. Case №: А56-8521/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 413 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
14. Case №: А56-8523/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Lyceum № 419 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
    › Primorsky regional department of Bailiff Service
15. Case №: А56-8524/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 15 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
16. Case №: А56-8596/2009
    Plaintiff: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › GOU Middle School of General education № 602
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
    Other persons: › Committee on management of city property of St. Petersburg
17. Case №: А56-8239/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №33 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
18. Case №: А56-8310/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 19 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
19. Case №: А56-7988/2009
    Plaintiff: › State special (correctional) educational institution for being trained, pupils with deviations in
    the development of special (correctional) General educational boarding school (6 form) №49
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
20. Case №: А56-7997/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №8 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
21. Case №: А56-8004/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №16 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
22. Case №: А56-8170/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №10 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
23. Case №: А56-8171/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №17 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
24. Case №: А56-8176/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №12 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
25. Case №: А56-8178/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten №25 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
26. Case №: А56-7577/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU kindergarten № 29 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
27. Case №: А56-50092/2011
    Plaintiff: › Limited Liability Company "TKR"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood+ (Detstvo+)"
28. Case №: А56-29277/2011
    Plaintiff: › ZAO (CJSC) "Children (Deti)"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Trading house Childhood (Detstvo)"
29. Case №: А56-13255/2011
    Plaintiff: › OOO (LLC) "Little country (Malenkaya strana)"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood+ (Detstvo+)"
30. Case №: А56-3934/2011
    Plaintiff: › OOO (LLC) "TKR"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood+ (Detstvo+)"
31. Case №: А56-22574/2010
    Plaintiff: › OOO (LLC) "Cascade (Kaskad)"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood+ (Detstvo+)"
32. Case №: А56-89800/2009
    Plaintiff: › The Federal service for veterinary and phytosanitary surveillance (Rosselhoznadzor) across St.-Petersburg and Leningrad region
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood (Detstvo)"
33. Case №: А56-89192/2009
    Plaintiff: › The management of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation (a public institution) in the Central district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › Non-state educational institution of preschool education "CHILDHOOD (DETSTVO)"
    Other persons: › Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №15 in St. Petersburg
    › Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №10 in St. Petersburg
34. Case №: А56-55925/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Secondary School № 411 "Harmony" with in-depth study of English Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
35. Case №: А56-55135/2009
    Plaintiff: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › GDOU The child development centre-kindergarten №25 with the implementation of the physical and mental development, correction and rehabilitation of all children in Petrodvortsovy district of St. Petersburg
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
36. Case №: А56-55141/2009
    Plaintiff: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › GDOU Kindergarten №8 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
37. Case №: А56-55145/2009
    Plaintiff: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › GDOU Kindergarten №1 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
38. Case №: А56-47799/2009
    Plaintiff: › OOO (LLC) "Konik"
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Childhood + (Detstvo +)"
39. Case №: А56-45997/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU Kindergarten №8 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
40. Case №: А56-42925/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU Kindergarten №10 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
41. Case №: А56-42945/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education №529 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №15 in St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
42. Case №: А56-43036/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU Center for Child Development kindergarten №25 with the implementation of the physical and mental development, correction and rehabilitation of all children in Petrodvortsovy district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
43. Case №: А56-30227/2009
    Plaintiff: › State educational institution open (replaceable) comprehensive school № 10 of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
44. Case №: А56-28588/2009
    Plaintiff: › State preschool educational institution children's kindergarten № 269 of Moscovsky district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
45. Case №: А56-11012/2009
    Plaintiff: › GDOU Kindergarten №1 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"
    Other persons: › Federal Tax Service of Russia in St. Petersburg
46. Case №: А56-10457/2009
    Plaintiff: › GOU Middle School of General education № 529 Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    › Administration of Petrodvorets district of St. Petersburg
    Defendant: › OOO (LLC) "Food company "Childhood (Detstvo)"

_________________________________________________________________________________________

We advise you to seek information on the Internet by keywords and not on the links,
because many links become obsolete, or the information is deliberately destroyed. Back to the text of the article.